Establishing Autonomy and Responsibilities of Science Writers

Ana Nadhya Abrar, I Gusti Ngurah Putra, Adam Wijoyo Sukarno, Desmalinda Desmalinda, Mirfath Mirfath

Abstract


An important theme of science communication research is research on science article writers. However, not many scholars are interested in doing this research. Based on this fact, we conducted a research on the ideal position of a science article writer. It  turns out that he definition of science writer has changed in Indonesia. Quantitative content analysis of articles reported by The Conversation Indonesia during December 2021 found that the writerss motivated the public to understand and use scientific principles to meet their daily needs. The results of in-depth interviews with three prominent professors at Universitas Gadjah Mada confirm the same fact. They do not just tell the object of research in a certain context. This fact certainly needs to be imitated by other science writers. However, there is a basic recipe that must be practiced by other science writers. The practice of the recipe will make them autonomous and responsible to society. Thus, the article will explain the ways that can be taken to make it happen.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Science communication research Themes and challenges. In Massimiano Bucchi dan Brian Trench (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge

Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Understand. Sci. 12, 183–202. DOI: 10.1177/09636625030122004.

Cooper C.P., & Yukimura D. (2002). Science writers’ reactions to a medical “breakthrough” story. Social Science & Medicine. 54(12), 1887–1896.6

Davis, L.S. (2010). Science Communication: a “Down Under” Perspective. Japanese Journal of Science Communication. 7, 65-71.

Fehr, HF. (1978). Komunikasi Pemikiran Keilmuan, in Sumantri, J (editor), Ilmu dalam Perspektif: Sebuah Kumpulan Karangan tentang Hakekat Ilmu. Yayasan Obor Indonesia dan LEKNAS LIPI.

Friedman, S.M., Goodell, R., & Verbit, L.P (1979). The Directory of Science Communication Courses and Programs, The Journal of Environmental Education. 10(4), 33-34.

Gascoigne, T., Schiele, B., Leach, J., Riedlinger, M., Lewenstein, B., Massarani, L., & Broks, P., eds. (2020) Communicating Science: Global Perspective. ANU Press.

Geller, G., Bernhardt, B.A., Gardner, M., Rodgers, J., & Holtzman, N.A. (2005). Scientists’ and science writers experiences reporting genetic discoveries: Toward an ethic of trust in science journalism. Genetics in Medicine, 7(3), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000156699.78856.23

Guenther, L., & Joubert, M. (2017). Science communication as a field of research: identifying trends, challenges, and gaps by analyzing research papers. JCOM 16(2), A02.

Hin, L., & Subramaniam, R. (2014). Challenges Facing Developing Countries in Communicating Science to the Public. In L. Hin and R. Subramaniam (eds). Communicating Science to the Public: Opportunities and challenges for the Asia Pacific region. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 213–222. DOI:10.1007/97894-017-9097-0_13.

Hornig, P.S. (2012). Editor’s Note. Science Communication. 34(1), 3–4. DOI:10.1177/1075547011432805.

Joesoef, D. (2006). Dia dan Aku: Memoar Pencari Kebenaran. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Kappel, K., & Holmen SJ (2019) Why Science Communication, and Does It Work? A Taxonomy of Science Communication Aims and a Survey of the Empirical Evidence. Frontiers in Communication. 4(55). doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00055.

Kua, E., Reder, M., & Grossel, M. J. (2004). Science in the News: A Study of Reporting Genomics. Public Understanding of Science. 13(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504045539

Littlejohn, S.W., & Foss, K.A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. SAGE Publication

Massarani, L., & Oliveira, T. (2022). Research in science communication in America: mind the gap. JCOM, 21(7), C08. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21070308.

Mulder, H.A.J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L.S. (2008) The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication. 30, 277–287.

Navarro, K., & McKinnon, M. (2020). Challenges of communicating science: perspectives from the Philippines. JCOM, 19(01), A03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19010203.

Newman, T.P. (2019). Theory and Best Practices in Science Communication Training. Routledge.

Nurcahyo, W. (2022). Personal interview with Ana Nadhya Abrar, Agustus 16, 2022

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2014). Gender on the brain: A case study of science communication in the new media environment. PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.011 830

Pradiptyo, R. (2022). Personal interview with I Gusti Ngurah Putra, Agustus 29, 2022.

Smith, D.R. (2016). One scientist’s struggle to be a better writer, and a plea for undergraduate science-writing engagement. Science Communication, 38(5), 666-674. https://doiorg.ezproxy.ugm.ac.id/10.1177/107554 016664737

Suhendro, B.S. (2006). Membina Science Literacy. in Ahmad Mursyidi, Menuju Tertib Kehidupan Kampus. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Sularto, S. (ed). (2016). Penghargaan Kompas: Cendekiawan Berdedikasi 2008 2016. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

The World Bank. (2018). Perkembangan triwulanan perekonomian Indonesia: Pendidikan untuk pertumbuhan. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curat d/en/379011531893611851/pdf/126891 BAHASA-PUBLIC-IEQ-June-2018-ID N-For-web.pdf

Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2010). ‘Science communication, an emerging discipline. JCOM 09 (03), C03. URL: http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/09/03/Jcom003%282010%29C01/Jcom0903%28201%29C03

Utarini, A. (2022). ). Personal interview with I Gusti Ngurah Putra, Oktober 4, 2022

Wahyuni, H.I. (2021). Komunikasi autopoiesis sebagai energi dan adaptasi system sosial: respon, resonansi, (r)evolusi. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam Bidang Ilmu Komunikasi Pada Fakultas lmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Xu, L., Huang, B., & Wu. G. (2015). Mapping Science Communication scholarship in China: Content analysis on breadth, depth, and agenda of published research. Public Understanding of Science, 24(8), 897-912. DOI:10.1177/0963662515600966




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.769



      




Article Metrics:

Abstract Views - 163

PDF Downloads - 115



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Nadhya Abrar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Indexed by:
Google Scholar  


Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (P-ISSN : 2548-8740, E-ISSN : 2503-0795)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Secretariat:
Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (JKISKI)
Gedung Dewan Pers 5th Floors, Jl. Kebon Sirih 32-34 Jakarta 10110 - Indonesia

Contact Person : Prof. Dr. Rajab Ritonga, M.Si

Email : rajab.r@lspr.edu

Whatsapp : +62811133471


View My Stats