Psychological Communication in the Self Concept and Cultural Identity of the People of Indramayu Regency through Ngarot Tradition

Main Article Content

Yeni Nuraeni
Ashur Harmadi
Sugiharti Binastuti
Diana Sari

Abstract

This research aims to find out psychological communication through the self-concept and cultural identity of the people of  Indramayu Regency using a symbolic interaction theory (mind, self and society). Ngarot tradition evolved within Lelea community in Indramayu Regency, West Java, where they celebrated  the tradition every year. The word Ngarot comes from Sanskrit which means to cleanse oneself from stains and sins from the wrong behavior of a person or a group of people in the past.  Ngarot tradition is closely related to the cultural identity that is shaped in the society and serves as the symbols of the next generation. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method. The results of the research show that the self-concept of the people of  Indramayu Regency is designed to appreciate and respect the culture, by preserving it through agricultural activities, as well as to express  gratitude to God. The cultural identity of the Lelea community can be seen from various things that developed in the area, including those in the socio-cultural, economic, and religious fields.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nuraeni, Y., Harmadi, A. ., Binastuti, S. ., & Sari, D. . (2024). Psychological Communication in the Self Concept and Cultural Identity of the People of Indramayu Regency through Ngarot Tradition. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 9(2), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v9i2.963
Section
Articles

References

Alvin., ect. (1980). Sosiologi Kerangka Acuan,

Metode Penelitian Teori- teori Tentang Sosialisasi, Kepribadian dan Kebudyaan. Surabaya: PT. Bina Usaha.

Steven.,ect (1992) Pengantar Metode Penelitian

Kualitatif (Suatu Pendekatan Fenomenologis Terhadap Ilmu Sosial). Surabaya: Usaha Nasional Indah.

Creswell, J. 2013. Research Design Pendekatan

Kualitatif, Kuantitaif, dan Mixed.

Greetz, Clifford. (1973). “Thick description:

Toward an interpretive theory of culture” Dalam The Interpreatation of Cultures.New York: Basic Books

Griffin, Emory A. (2003). A First Look at

Communication Theory, 5th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

James, W. (1980). The principles of psychology.

New York: Henry Holt and Company

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu

Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kuntowijoyo (2005). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah.

Yogyakarta: PT Bentang Pustaka

Liliweri, Alo. (2003). Makna Budaya Dalam

Komunikasi Antar Budaya,

Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Miller, David. (1973). George Herbert Mead:

Symbolic Interaction. The Psychological

Record, Denison University, Granville,

Ohio 43023.

Morcom, L. (2017). Self-esteem and Cultural

Identity in Aboriginal Language Immersion Kindergarteners

Mpofu, E. (2010). Exploring the Self-Concept in

an African Culture.

Moleong. Lexy, J. (2012). Metodologi

Penelitian Kualitatif.

Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rahmat. (2005). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi.

Bandung : Rosdakarya

Rakhmat. (2001). Psikologi komunikasi edisi

evisi.bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Samian. (2002). Sejarah Desa Lelea. Indramayu:

Disporabudpar

Samovar, Larry, H, dkk. (2010). Komunikasi Lintas

Budaya Edisi 7. Penerbit Salemba Humanika, Jakarta

Soemardi. (1964). Seangkai Bunga Sosiologi.

Jakarta: Yayasan Penerbit FE UI.

Soeprapto, Riyadi. (2002). Interaksionisme

Simbolik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Soerjono Soekanto. (2006). Sosiologi Suatu

Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo

Persada.

Sunjata, W.P. (1997). Kupatan Jalasutera Tradisi,

Makna dan Simboliknya. Yogyakarta: Depdikbud.

Sapphira, N.R. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat

Kampung Kauman pada Tradisi Sekaten

di Keraton Yogyakarta. Endogami:

Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. C. (2012).

Understanding Intercultural, Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.