Debt Collection Violations in Financial Technology in a Cyber-ethic and Legal Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
The presence of financial technology (Fintech) on the one hand makes it easy for people to obtain credit, while on the other hand, it creates various problems. In this study, two issues will be discussed, namely the application of cyber-ethic in protecting personal data and legal issues in collecting debt on Fintech. This research is a qualitative research. Data in the study were collected by means of literature study and presented descriptively and analytically. Cyber-ethic is implemented by protecting personal data. It is a transformation of traditional ethics in cyberspace. The cyber-ethic is very necessary in the business world. The application of cyber-ethic in the world of Fintech is carried out by protecting the personal data of both borrowers and third parties. Cyber-ethic violations have implications for breaking the law. Some of the billing violations on the Fintech business are sexual harassment, defamation, threats and stalking. Borrowing customers are powerless to face debt collectors’ behavior, because the debt collectors use the borrowers’ personal data to exert psychological pressure on the debtors to pay according to the bills determined unilaterally by Fintech. This condition usually occurs in illegal Fintechs that are not registered with the Financial Services Authority.
Article Details
Authors who publish with Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Achmad D.A. (2020). Ngerinya Terjerat Pinjol Ilegal: Diminta Foto Bugil! Retrieved April 1, 2021, from https://finance.detik.com/fintech/d-4873881/ngerinya-terjerat-pinjol-ilegal-diminta-foto-bugil https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/afpi-penagihan-tidak-beretika-paling-diadukan-konsumen-fintech-p2p
Adetimirin, A. (2017). Awareness and knowledge of cyber ethics by library and information science doctoral students in two Nigerian universities. International Journal of Technology Policy and Law, 3(1), 43-55.
Al-Mudimigh, A., & Anshari, M. (2020). Financial technology and innovative financial inclusion. Financial technology and disruptive innovation in ASEAN, IGI Global. 119, 119-129.
BF, A. R. H., Wisudawan, I. G. A., & Setiawan, Y. (2020). Pengaturan Bisnis Pinjaman Secara Online atau Fintech Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Ganec Swara, 14(1), 464-475.
Dewi, S. (2009). Cyber law: Perlindungan privasi atas informasi pribadi dalam e-commerce menurut hukum internasional. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.
Fachrurrazy, M., & Siliwadi, D. N. (2020). Regulasi dan Pengawasan Fintech di Indonesia: Persfektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Al-Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 2(2), 154-171.
Fahrimal, Y. (2018). Netiquette: Etika Jejaring Sosial Generasi Milenial dalam Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Pers dan Komunikasi Pembangunan, 22(1), 69-78.
Fardiyan, A. R. (2016). Etika Siber dan Signifikansi Moral Dunia Maya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Komunikasi: Akselerasi Pembangunan Masyarakat Lokal Melalui Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi, 331-337.
Lumenta, A. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang ITE. Lex Crimen, 9(1).24.
Mudzakir. (2004). Delik Penghinaan dalam Pemberitaan Pers Mengenai Pejabat Publik. Jakarta: Dictum.
Nasrullah, R. (2017). Media Sosial Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Nasrullah, R. (2014). Teori dan riset media siber (cybermedia). Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Novinna, V. Perlindungan Konsumen dari Penyebarluasan Data Pribadi oleh Pihak Ketiga: Kasus Fintech “Peer to Peer Lending”. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 9(1), 92-110.
Nurdiani, I. P. (2020). Pencurian Identitas Digital Sebagai Bentuk Cyber Related Crime. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 16(2).
Nurwahridya, M. M. Peranan Polri dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Siber oleh Desk Collector Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan penanggulangan Kejahatan, 9(1), 43-49.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Penyelenggara Fintech Lending Terdaftar dan Berizin di OJK per 10 Januari 2021, Retrieved April 1, 2021, fromhttps://www.ojk.go.id/id/kan
Priskarini, I. A., & Tejomurti, K. (2019). The Role of The Financial Services Authority in The Legal Protection of Privacy Rights in Connection with Personal Data of Fintech Lending Debtor in Indonesia. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 6(3), 556-575.
Ramadhon, F. N. (2019). Pasar Masyarakat Digital dan Degradasi Netiquette. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 73-82.
Suseno, Sigid. (2012). Yurisdiksi Tindak Pidana Siber, Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Shayganmehr, M., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). Industry 4.0 enablers for a cleaner production and circular economy within the context of business ethics: a study in a developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125280.
Shkodina, I., Timoshenkov, I., & Nashchekina, O. (2018). The impact of financial technology on the transformation of the financial system. Фінансово-кредитна діяльність: проблеми теорії та практики, (1), 417-424.
Shofiyah, E. N., & Susilowati, I. F. (2019). Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Penerima Pinjaman dalam Peer to Peer Lending. Novum Journal, 1(2), 1-6.
Sinaga, H. D. E., Irawati, N., & Kurniawan, E. (2019). Financial Technology: Pinjaman Online, Ya atau Tidak. Jurnal Tunas, 1(1), 14-19.
Suharini, S., & Hastasari, R. (2020). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan terhadap Fintech Ilegal di Indonesia sebagai Upaya Perlindungan pada Konsumen. Jurnal Akrab Juara, 5(3), 25-38.
Tendiyanto, T. (2021). Pelanggaran Penyelenggara Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending Financial Technology Ilegal Terhadap Debitur. Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan, 12(01), 85-93.
Terminanto, A. A. (2020). Analisa Penyelesaiaan Transaksi Penagihan Fintek Tanpa Adanya Jaminan. Zhafir| Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance and Banking, 2(1), 1-14.
Tira Santia. (2020). Penyaluran Pinjaman Fintech P2P Lending di 2020 Capai Rp 74,41 Triliun. Retrieved April 1, 2021, from https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4485532/penyaluran-pinjaman-fintech-p2p-lending-di-2020-capai-rp-7441-triliun.
Wahyuni, R. A. E., & Turisno, B. E. (2019). Praktik Finansial Teknologi Ilegal dalam Bentuk Pinjaman Online Ditinjau dari Etika Bisnis. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 379-391.
Wijayanto, H., Muhammad, A. H., & Hariyadi, D. (2020). Analisis Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi dalam Aplikasi Fintech Ilegal dengan Metode Hibrid. Jurnal Ilmiah SINUS, 18(1), 1-10.
Yuliana, R. R. R. D. (2019). Sinergi Lembaga Teknologi Finansial dan Koperasi dalam Pemanfaatan Teknologi Finansial oleh Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah di NTB. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 27(1), 53-66.
Yudho Winarto (ed). AFPI: Penagihan tidak beretika paling diadukan konsumen fintech P2P. Retrieved April 1, 2021, from https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/afpi-penagihan-tidak-beretika-paling-diadukan-konsumen-fintech-p2p.