Cyberintimacy Involvement on Building Emotional Intimacy in Close Relationship on Indonesian Tinder Users

Main Article Content

Fahira Syifa Machfudz
Rino Febrianno Boer
Nicky Wongso

Abstract

Tinder, as one of the most popular online dating applications, is nicknamed as the hookup app. The negative perceptions inherent among the public were born because of how users in western countries operate the application, which does not follow the norms adopted in Indonesia. Many people assume that most Tinder users are those who are not looking for a long-term romantic relationship. The possibility of getting a partner who will commit to the relationship is not a common idea. This research aims to understand the development process of emotional intimacy and the initiation of a close relationship between Tinder users who have managed to find their partner through the Tinder application and communication mediated by computers (internet). This research uses a qualitative approach. In-depth interviews and Netnographic observations were used as the primary and secondary data collection techniques. This study indicates that although many Tinder users in Indonesia use Tinder similar to how people in western countries do, many users have finally succeeded in building long-term close relationships. Therefore, the perception about small numbers of Tinder users looking for long-term romantic relationships is not accurate.

Article Details

How to Cite
Machfudz, F. S., Boer, R. F., & Wongso, N. (2021). Cyberintimacy Involvement on Building Emotional Intimacy in Close Relationship on Indonesian Tinder Users. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 6(2), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v6i2.557
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Rino Febrianno Boer, Communication Study in Postgraduate Programme, Institut Komunikasi dan Bisnis LSPR Sudirman Park, Jl. KH. Mas Mansyur Kav. No. 35 Jakarta 10220 - Indonesia

Facebook Profile : https://www.facebook.com/rino.boer?fref=ts

References

Abrams, Z. I. (2001). Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Journals: Expanding the Repertoire of Participant Roles. System. 29(4), 489-503.

Anderson, R. (2016, September 6th). The Ugly Truth about Online Dating. Retrieved October 7th 2019 From https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mating-game/201609/the-ugly-

truth-about-online-dating

Baron, N.S. (1998). Letters By Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email. Language & Communication, 18(2), 133-170.

Bijker, W. E (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press.

Bijker, W. E. & Pinch, T. J. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Journal of Social Studies of Science, 14, P.399-441. Doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004

Bodomo, A. (2009). Computer-Mediated Communication for Linguistics and Literacy: Technology and Natural Language Education. Hershey, Pa: Information Science Reference

Bogle, K. A. (2008) Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus. New York: New York University Press.

Boyce, C. & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting in-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2. Watertown, Ma: Pathfinder International.

Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows. New York City, NY: Norton & Co

Carlson, W. B. (1992). Artifacts and Frames of Meaning: Thomas A. Edison, His Managers, and the Cultural Construction of Motion Pictures. Cambridge, England: MIT Press.

Carlson, W.B. & Gorman, M.E. (1992). A Cognitive Framework to Understand Technological Creativity: Bell, Edison, And The Telephone. In Weber, R.J. & Perkins, D.N. (Eds.) Inventive Minds: Creativity In Technology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Corrin, S. (2020, October 23). How to go viral on twitter (10 easy strategies). Retrieved March 23, 2021, from https://rafflepress.com/how-to-go-viral-on-twitter/#:~:text=A%20viral%20tweet%20is%20a,retweets%2C%20likes%2C%20and%20replies

Dahms, A. M (1972). Emotional Intimacy: Overlooked Required for Survival. Boulder, CA: Pruett Publishing Co.

E F E L [Neferel]. (2019, Augustus 4). From Here to 20 Months Later [Twitter Moment]. Retrieved From https://Twitter.Com/Neferefel/Status/1157957711989899266

Fahmi, A. F., & Armando, N., M. (2014). Penggunaan Tinder dan Pengembangan Hubungan dengan Match dalam Tinder (Studi terhadap Mahasiswa/i Universitas Indonesia Pengguna Tinder). Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia.

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., Sprecher, S. (2012). Online Dating: A Critical Analysis from the Perspective of Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 13(2). 3-66. Doi: 10.1177/1529100612436522

Fox, J. & Anderegg, C. (2014). Romantic Relationship Stages and Social Networking Sites: Uncertainty Reduction Strategiesand Perceived Relational Norms on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 17(11). 685-691. Doi: 10.1089/Cyber.2014.0232

Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual Hookup Culture: a Review. Review of General Psychology. 16(2). 161-176. Doi: 10.1037/A0027911

Lea, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R. (2002). Intergroup Differentiation in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 3-16. Doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3

Klein, H., & Kleinman, D. (2002). The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(1), 28-52.

Kwok, I., & Wescott, A. B. (2020). Cyberintimacy: A scoping Review of Technology-Mediated Romance in the Digital Age. Journal of Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 23(10). 657-666. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0764

Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. London, Uk: Sage Publications Ltd.