Presidential Rhetoric in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Jokowi’s Aristotelian Rhetorical Leadership Models Before and After Implementation of Semi-Lock Down Policy

Nyarwi Ahmad

Abstract


Presidential rhetoric evolved across the globe. Knowledge regarding the ways the presidents in democratic countries, which followed the presidential government system, such as Indonesia, advanced Aristotelian rhetorical leadership models in the covid-19 pandemic era, has, however, under-developed. Selecting president Joko Widodo (Jokowi) as a study case, this work raises the following question: what types of Aristotelian rhetorical leadership models performed by Jokowi before and after semi-lock down policy (PSBB) and how did he advance such rhetorical leaderships models? Focusing on such questions, this work adopts the president’s rhetorical leadership models, posited by Teten (2007) and Aristotelian rhetoric models, formulated by Gottweis (2007), as a conceptual framework. The materials posted in official Facebook pages of president Joko Widodo were extracted using the classic content and the qualitative and thematic content analyses. The findings are follows. Soon after the covid-19 pandemic outbreak took place in Indonesia, he attempted to develop the following types of rhetorical leadership, which are the identification, the authority and the directive rhetoric and the etho -logo-, and patho-centric Aristotelian rhetoric. Based on Indonesia case, this work offers the following knowledge contribution. It gives us new knowledge of 9 Aristotelian rhetorical leadership models, which are the etho-, logo- and patho-centric identification rhetoric, the etho-, logo- and patho-centric authority rhetoric and the etho-, logo- and patho-centric directive rhetoric models. Not merely the presidents, but also the local governments’ leaders could adopt such rhetoric models when they want to resolve diverse issues resulting from the pandemic.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bernstein, R. J. (2009). The Secular-Religious Divide: Kant's Legacy, Social Research, 76 (4), 1035-1048

Bowles, N. (1999). Studying the Presidency. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 1-23.

Brinton, A. (1988). Pathos and the "Appeal to Emotion": An Aristotelian Analysis, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5 (3), 207-219

Burnam, J. (2010). The President and the Environment: A Reinterpretation of Neustadt's Theory of Presidential Leadership. Congress and the Presidency, 37(3), 302-322.

Butler-Kisber, L. 2010. Qualitative Inquiry: Thematic, Narrative and Arts- Informed Perspectives. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed Methods Research (2th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Duke, C. R., Pickett, G.M., Carlson, L. and Grove, S.J. (1993). A Method for Evaluating the Ethics of Fear Appeals. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12 (1), 120-129

Edwards III, G.C. (1997). Aligning Tests with Theory: Presidential Approval as a Source of Influence in Congress. Congress and the Presidency, 24(2), 113-130.

Eisenhart, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550.

Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2010). The Politics of Presidential Speeches. Congress and the Presidency 37 (1), 1-21.

Eshbaugh-Soha, M. & Miles, T. (2011). Presidential Speeches and the Stages of the Legislative Process. Congress and the Presidency, 38(3), 301-321.

Eshbaugh-Soha, M. & Peake, J. S. (2004). Presidential Influence Over the Systemic Agenda. Congress and the Presidency, 31(2), 181-201.

Fried, A. & Cole, T. M. (2004). Presidential Impeachment and Institutional Dynamics in the Iran-Contra Affair and the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal. Congress and the Presidency, 31(1), 77-98.

Gilbert, R.E. (2006). Personal Tragedy and Presidential Performance: Calvin Coolidge as Legislative Leader. Congress and the Presidency, 33(2), 47-68.

Gottweis, H. (2017). Rhetoric in Policy Making: Between Logos, Ethos, and Pathos, in Frank Fischer, Gerald J Miller and Mara S. Sidney (Eds). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods (pp.237-250). London: Taylor & Francis Group

Hickel Jr, F. R. (2019). Building Alliances or Rallying the Base: Civil Religious Rhetoric and the Modern Presidency. Congress and the Presidency. DOI, 10.1080/07343469.2019.1569175

Insead, R.L.H., & Green JR., S.E. (2016). A Rhetorical Model of Institutional Decision Making: The Roles of Rhetoric in the Formation and Chance of Legitimacy Judgements, Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 130-150.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.

Keen, S. (2006). A Theory of Narrative Empathy, Narrative, 14 (3), 207-236

King, James D. Riddlesperger Jr., & James W. (1995). Unscheduled Presidential Transitions: Lessons from the Truman, Johnson, and Ford Administrations. Congress and the Presidency, 22(1), 1-17.

Lebo, M.J. (2008). Divided Government, United Approval: The Dynamics of Congressional and Presidential Approval. Congress and the Presidency, 35(2), 1-16.

Moe, T.M. (2009). The Revolution in Presidential Studies. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39(4): 701-724

Morris, B. S. (1986). Presidential Accountability in Foreign Policy, Some Recurring Problems. Congress and the Presidency, 13(2), 157-176

Neustadt, R.E. (1960). Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Neustadt, R.E. (1976). Presidential Power with Reflections on Johnson and Nixon. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Olds, C. (2013). Assessing Presidential Agenda-Setting Capacity, Dynamic Comparisons of Presidential, Mass Media, and Public Attention to Economic Issues. Congress and the Presidency, 40(3), 255-284.

Price-Thomas, G. and Turnbull, N. (2018). Thickening Rhetorical Political Analysis with a Theory of Distance: Negotiating the Greek Episode of the Eurozone Crisis. Political Studies, 66 (1), 209-225.

Ponder, D.E. (1996). Three Strategies of Presidential Policy Making, Politics and Policy in the Carter Administration. Congress and the Presidency, 23(2), 113-137.

Rooduijn. M., & Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics, 34 (6): 1272-1283.

Ryan, E.E. (1984). Aristotle's Theory of Rhetorical Argumentation. Montreal: Collection Noesis, Editions Bellarmin.

Shaw, C. M. (1998). President Clinton's First Term: Matching Campaign Promises with Presidential Performance. Congress and the Presidency, 25(1), 43-65.

Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 (1), 35-67

Syahputra, I., Ritonga, R., Purwani, D. A., Rahmaniah, S. E., & Wahid, U. (2021). Pandemic politics and communication crisis: How social media buzzers impaired the lockdown aspiration in Indonesia.

Tenpas, K.D. & Dickinson, M.J. (1997). Governing, Campaigning, and Organizing the Presidency, An Electoral Connection? Political Science Quarterly, 112(1), 51-66

Teten, R.L (2007). “We the People”: The “Modern” Rhetorical Popular Address of the Presidents during the Founding Period. Political Research Quarterly, 60(4): 669-682

Thomas, N.C. (1977). Studying the Presidency: Where and How Do We Go from Here? Presidential Studies Quarterly, 7(4): 169-175

Windt Jr, T.O. (1986). Presidential Rhetoric: Definition of a Field Study. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 16(1): 102-116.

Yin, R.B. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods. Sage Publication: London




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v6i1.538



      




Article Metrics:

Abstract Views - 200

PDF Downloads - 105



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Nyarwi Ahmad, Ph.D

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Indexed by: 
Google Scholar  Mendeley

Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (P-ISSN : 2548-8740, E-ISSN : 2503-0795)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Secretariat:
Jurnal Komunikasi: Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (ISKI)
Gedung Dewan Pers 5th Floors, Jl. Kebon Sirih 32-34 Jakarta 10110 - Indonesia

Contact Person: Prof. Dr. Rajab Ritonga, M.Si

Email                  : rajab.ritonga@dsn.moestopo.ac.id

Call/Whatsapp : +62811133471
View My Stats